The Court has claimed the role of “guardian of the constitution”, and neither Parliament nor the provincial legislatures have claimed any authority where the Charter is concerned. On the contrary, they have factored judicial exclusivity in Charter interpretation into their political deliberations. This paper considers the notion that the judiciary is the only legitimate interpreter of the Charter — how it became established, and the impact it has had on public policy and the political process in Canada. The pending reference to the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage is considered as an example of the problems judicial exclusivity can cause
In 1990, Supreme Court Justice Bertha Wilson proclaimed that the Canadian Charter of Rights \u27is a...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter jurisprudence often resembles a seesaw. The Court will tilt to...
This piece explores the apparent disjuncture between the prescribed duties of both the judicial and ...
The Court has claimed the role of “guardian of the constitution”, and neither Parliament nor the pro...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
The Supreme Court of Canada\u27s initial interpretations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freed...
This paper addresses the issue of the legitimacy of judicial review from a methodological perspectiv...
Dialogue theory regards judicial interpretation of the Charter as authoritative, and, as a result, d...
In this paper, the author examines the implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Dou...
The Supreme Court of Canada released seven Charter decisions in 2012 that were not unanimous. When c...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
Beetz J. made a superb contribution to the public law of Canada. His views were always thoughtful, b...
Professor Cameron provides an overview of the 2004 Supreme Court jurisprudence and states that despi...
In 1990, Supreme Court Justice Bertha Wilson proclaimed that the Canadian Charter of Rights \u27is a...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter jurisprudence often resembles a seesaw. The Court will tilt to...
This piece explores the apparent disjuncture between the prescribed duties of both the judicial and ...
The Court has claimed the role of “guardian of the constitution”, and neither Parliament nor the pro...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
The Supreme Court of Canada\u27s initial interpretations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freed...
This paper addresses the issue of the legitimacy of judicial review from a methodological perspectiv...
Dialogue theory regards judicial interpretation of the Charter as authoritative, and, as a result, d...
In this paper, the author examines the implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Dou...
The Supreme Court of Canada released seven Charter decisions in 2012 that were not unanimous. When c...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
Beetz J. made a superb contribution to the public law of Canada. His views were always thoughtful, b...
Professor Cameron provides an overview of the 2004 Supreme Court jurisprudence and states that despi...
In 1990, Supreme Court Justice Bertha Wilson proclaimed that the Canadian Charter of Rights \u27is a...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter jurisprudence often resembles a seesaw. The Court will tilt to...
This piece explores the apparent disjuncture between the prescribed duties of both the judicial and ...